When a soldier returns from a combat zone with a service-related injury, there is a system, however imperfect, waiting for them. The Department of Veterans Affairs provides medical care. Their sacrifice is acknowledged. Their community understands what they gave.
For the civilian contractor who worked alongside that soldier, often performing the same dangerous work in the same hostile territory, the homecoming looks nothing like this. There are no parades, no VA hospitals, no yellow ribbons. There is only anonymity, confusion, and a mailbox.
Consider the story of a man we’ll call Mike, a composite drawn from countless real cases. Mike, a Florida native, spent three years in Iraq as a logistics specialist for a private military contractor. He survived mortar attacks, vehicle rollovers, and the constant grind of 12-hour shifts in 120-degree heat.
When a rocket attack left him with a traumatic brain injury and chronic back damage, he assumed, as anyone would, that the government would take care of him. He was, after all, supporting a U.S. military mission under a federal contract.
Instead, six weeks after returning home to Tampa, Mike received a letter. Not from the Department of Defense. Not from any government agency. It came from a private insurance corporation he had never heard of, and it informed him that his claim for benefits was denied. His war was over. His war after the war, one that would eventually require him to hire an attorney just to receive the benefits he was owed, had just begun.
Table of Contents
The Middleman: It’s Not Uncle Sam Writing the Check
The Defense Base Act, passed in 1941, is the federal law that mandates workers’ compensation coverage for civilian contractors working overseas on U.S. government projects. The Department of Labor provides oversight, and many injured workers naturally assume this means the federal government will be managing their care and compensation.
This assumption is wrong. The actual money, for medical treatment, for lost wages, for any benefits the injured worker receives, comes from massive, for-profit insurance carriers. Companies like AIG, Starr Indemnity, and a handful of other corporate giants underwrite the policies that defense contractors are required to purchase. When a worker files a claim, they are not petitioning the government for help. They are filing a claim against a publicly traded corporation.
This arrangement creates a fundamental conflict of interest that sits at the heart of every Defense Base Act case. The insurance company has a fiduciary duty to its shareholders to maximize profits, which means minimizing payouts. The injured worker has a desperate need for medical care and income replacement. These two interests are not just misaligned, they are directly opposed.
The government set the rules. The insurance company plays the game. And the injured worker is often the only party at the table who doesn’t understand what game is being played.
Delay, Deny, Defend: The Playbook
The insurance industry’s approach to claims management has been distilled into a simple, brutal phrase: delay, deny, defend. It is not a secret. It is a strategy.
Delay takes many forms. Phone calls go unanswered for weeks. Medical procedure authorizations languish in review until the worker’s condition deteriorates. Paperwork gets lost, requiring resubmission and further waiting. Every day of delay is a day the insurer holds onto its money while the injured worker watches their savings evaporate.
Denial often relies on creative interpretations of medical history. A back injury caused by a bomb blast might be attributed to the fact that the worker played high school football twenty years earlier. A shoulder torn during a vehicle accident in Afghanistan might be blamed on “age-related degeneration.” The denial letter arrives written in clinical, authoritative language, and many workers simply accept it, unaware they have the right to fight back.
Defense is what happens when the worker does fight back. Insurers have armies of lawyers whose entire practice consists of defending claims. They know that most injured workers do not have the financial resources to sustain a prolonged legal battle.
The objective of this playbook is not always to win outright. Often, it is simply to force the worker into such a desperate financial position that they will accept a lowball settlement just to keep their house or feed their family. The insurer calculates that a quick $30,000 settlement is far cheaper than paying $300,000 or more in lifetime medical benefits. For the injured worker, that calculation means signing away their future to survive their present.
Surveillance State: You Are Being Watched
If a Defense Base Act claim proceeds to litigation, the injured worker should assume they are being watched.
Insurance companies routinely hire private investigators to conduct surveillance on claimants. These investigators follow workers to grocery stores, to their children’s schools, to doctor’s appointments. They sit in parked cars with cameras. They scroll through social media accounts looking for photographs.
The goal is to capture a “gotcha” moment, a piece of evidence that can be used to frame the injured worker as a fraud. A man with a documented spinal injury photographed carrying a gallon of milk. A woman with a severe shoulder tear picking up her toddler. These moments, isolated from context, are presented to judges as proof that the worker is faking or exaggerating.
What this framing ignores is the fundamental reality of chronic pain: people push through it because they have no choice. Parents still parent. Human beings still perform the basic tasks required to exist. The fact that someone can, through gritted teeth, lift a bag of groceries does not mean they can return to hauling equipment across a construction site in a war zone.
Independent Medical Exam
Perhaps no tool in the insurer’s arsenal is as Orwellian as the Independent Medical Examination. Under the law, the insurance company can compel the injured worker to be examined by a physician of the company’s choosing.
These doctors often fly in from other states. They conduct examinations that last fifteen or twenty minutes. They review medical records that fill boxes. And then they produce reports that consistently find little or nothing wrong with the patient, reports that directly contradict the findings of the treating physicians who have seen the worker for months or years.
These examiners are not neutral arbiters. Many have built lucrative careers testifying on behalf of insurance companies, earning hundreds of thousands of dollars annually by providing the medical opinions that insurers need to cut off benefits. The word “independent” is a legal fiction.
Fighting Back: Why Legal Help Becomes Essential
For workers like Mike, the realization eventually sets in: the system is not designed to help them. It is designed to exhaust them. The insurance company has adjusters, corporate lawyers, and hired medical experts. The injured worker has a stack of medical bills and a dwindling bank account.
This is why so many Defense Base Act claimants ultimately turn to legal representation, not because they want to, but because they have no other choice. An experienced attorney understands the tactics insurers use and knows how to counter them. They can compel the production of evidence, depose biased medical examiners, and present a case before an administrative law judge who can override the insurance company’s denials.
For injured contractors in the Sunshine State, finding Florida DBA attorneys who specialize in Defense Base Act claims can mean the difference between years of stonewalling and a resolution that finally allows them to access the medical care and compensation they were promised. Mike eventually found such an attorney. It took another eighteen months of litigation, but he finally received the surgery he needed and the wage benefits he was owed.
He shouldn’t have had to fight that hard. But until the system changes, injured contractors need someone in their corner who knows how to fight back.
Hidden Cost of Privatized War
The human toll of this system extends far beyond denied medical claims. Workers who entered war zones healthy return home broken, then spend years fighting a bureaucratic and legal battle that breaks them further. Marriages collapse under the financial strain and emotional exhaustion. Mental health deteriorates as workers struggle with both their original injuries and the trauma of being treated as adversaries rather than people who served their country.
The true cost of America’s privatized military operations cannot be found in the contract prices paid to defense companies. It lives in the years of legal battles fought by workers long after the troops have come home, in the settlements signed under duress, in the medical care that never came.
These workers answered their country’s call. They deserve a system that answers theirs.
