It usually happens fast. One second, you’re walking through a store or stepping into an office building, the next, you’re on the ground, blinking up at fluorescent lights and wondering what just happened. Maybe your wrist hurts. Maybe your pride does more.
Either way, it’s jarring. And while you’re trying to make sense of it, someone’s probably already saying, “Are you okay?”
But that question, it’s not always simple to answer. Because beneath the pain or confusion, there’s another thought forming: Who’s actually responsible for this? That’s where premises liability comes in.
Table of Contents
Understanding Premises Liability
Premises liability law comes down to one thing: responsibility.
Property owners have a duty to keep their spaces safe for guests, customers, or anyone legally on the property. Simple in theory. Messy in practice.
The tricky part? “Reasonable care.” What’s reasonable to you, say, mopping up a spill right away, might sound “unrealistic” to a property owner trying to avoid blame.
And when you’re caught in the middle, it helps to have someone who knows the local system inside out. A skilled premises liability attorney in St. Louis, for example, understands how Missouri courts view these cases. They’ve seen every excuse, every defense, every attempt to twist a simple injury into “your problem.”
The Defenses Property Owners Love to Use
Once a claim’s filed, things move fast. First comes the friendly talk, then the quiet pivot. You’ll start hearing familiar phrases, “You should’ve been more careful,” “That hazard was obvious,” “We didn’t know about it.”
Let’s unpack those for a second.
Common Defense #1: “You Were Careless”
This one stings the most because it targets your behavior, not theirs. They’ll claim you weren’t paying attention, maybe distracted, rushing, or ignoring warning signs.
And if they succeed? Your payout drops. Even if they were mostly at fault. It’s called comparative negligence, and it’s how they turn accountability into arithmetic.
How an Attorney Counters
Attorneys shift the spotlight back where it belongs. They’ll dig up footage, maintenance logs, witness accounts, anything showing that no “reasonable” person could’ve avoided that hazard. It’s not about your shoes or your speed.
It’s about their failure to make the space safe, period.
Common Defense #2: “The Danger Was Obvious”
They love this one. If the hazard was “open and obvious,” they argue you should’ve seen it. Sure, in hindsight, a puddle or step-down seems obvious.
But real life isn’t lived in hindsight. You’re carrying groceries, answering a text, helping your kid out of the car. You’re not conducting a safety inspection with every step.
How an Attorney Counters
By showing context. Lighting, layout, distractions.
Maybe the warning sign was behind a door, or the spill blended into the floor. Attorneys remind juries that “obvious” only makes sense after the fact.
Common Defense #3: “We Didn’t Know and Had No Reason to”
Sometimes they claim ignorance. That they couldn’t have known about the danger in time to fix it. But “we didn’t know” only works if they actually tried to.
How an Attorney Counters
Good lawyers trace negligence backward, inspection logs, repair requests, internal emails. If the hazard was sitting there long enough, someone knew. Or should’ve.
Where It All Lands
These cases aren’t about theatrics. They’re about stories, whose version holds up when the dust settles. You’re not just proving you were hurt. You’re proving someone else should’ve stopped it from happening. And that takes grit, patience, and the right advocate by your side.
When property owners push back, they don’t always fight fair.
But neither do good attorneys, not when someone’s life just got upended over a hazard that should’ve been fixed in the first place. Kind of says a lot, doesn’t it?
